Dec
30th

Google Announces $1B Revenue Share Program with YOU!

It’s not true, just link bait.

Metacafe, a search and ranking system for videos, just surpassed $1,000,000 in shared revenue with its content creators. Mike reports that Revver also hit the $1,000,000 in shared revenue this year as well.

I’ve been critical of Google’s attack on content providers who solicit payment for link placement. Michael Graywolf has as well… he’s also taking major websites to task for caving to the Google Powers-That-Be.

Google claims that it’s simply trying to maintain its organic search results truly organic. The gray area of Google Terms of Service continue to blur, though. Most recently, Matt Cutts may have suggested that ALL links in a sponsored post must also be properly labeled with nofollow tags - not just the paid link provider.

As one of those ‘content providers’, I tend to view paid links a little differently. Just as Metacafe and Revver have recognized that they do not have a viable business without the associated providers, perhaps Google should as well.

If Google was serious about eliminating paid links, then they should share the revenue for my organic content that they are profiting from (by tagging with their own sponsored links). Why not pay me for the volume of great content that I allow Google to provide users with?

Google does not own the Internet, folks. It’s your content, not Google’s. We’re so busy scurrying to get Google’s attention half the time that we tend to forget this. Google’s done a masterful job in positioning themselves ‘above’ everyone else on the net.

Perhaps it’s time for a new Search Engine with a new business model?

You might also find these posts interesting:

RSS feed | Trackback URI

6 Comments »

Comment by no imagealanj878 (SezWho)
2007-12-30 14:18:00

I never heard of the metacafe before having an affiliate program I heard of revver shared revenue program that this month I made almost $40, which is more than I made in Google adsense go figure. I believe google should have shared content for organic results and also believe they should monetize youtube for the whole public instead of a few selected particpaants
Rate this:
2.9
 
Comment by no imageSergey Rusak (SezWho)
2007-12-30 15:06:37

I read a lot of bad articles when people complain about Google paid links policy and organic rankings.’
This article is the only one which explains a lot bringing real facts.
From my side I would like to support everything you are saying.
Rate this:
2.9
 
2007-12-30 16:28:26

Both Google and Yahoo for that matter have imposed a set of rules on users that benefit only Google and Yahoo and not the community of users. Obviously you’re right…the Internet and the content placed on it by the users belong to the users, not to the directories and to the search engines. The challenge is that as usual, the monetizing aspect is what drives the system and as long as there are those trying to take advantage of getting a quick buck, they will have the upper hand unless government…that bad word…steps in…go figure.

Thanks for speaking up.

Rate this:
2.9
 
Comment by no imageMike Schinkel (SezWho)
2007-12-30 18:23:59

The crows come home to roost! Heh!

I’ve been wary of Google for a while!

Rate this:
2.9
 
Comment by no imageMike Schinkel (SezWho)
2007-12-30 18:32:06

Also, very relevant here: my favorite book (ever?) “New Rules for the New Economy” by Kevin Kelley talks about how the “superwinners” gain from the “winner-take-most” environment of the network economy in Chapter 2 which you can read online. It (and the whole book) are definitely worth a read. Oh, BTW, it was written before Google even existed (or at least before they were well known.)
Rate this:
2.9
 
2007-12-30 22:55:15

[...] Karr recently called for a new search engine with a new model. He had his own reasons for doing so, but it got me thinking. I think that’s what we need. A [...]
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

My Comment Policy: I moderate comments. Please be patient:

  • Spam will happily be destroyed.
  • Use your real name, not some keywords. Otherwise it will be destroyed.
  • Mean comments aren't necessary. If I don't post them I will reply personally to let you know why.
  • Lewd comments will be edited, I don't want my readers leaving because of offensive content.
Great debate, criticism and colorful commentary is always appreciated and approved!