Feb
14th

Is dmoz dead?

dmoz

According to the dmoz.org:

The Open Directory Project is the largest, most comprehensive human-edited directory of the Web. It is constructed and maintained by a vast, global community of volunteer editors.

For those unfamiliar with dmoz, it used to be a lively project - the wiki of search engines where folks could categorize sites and announce their arrival to the net. Of recent, though, I’ve submitted several of my sites on several occasions utilizing their submission process. Months later, my sites are still not posted anywhere within dmoz’s database.

A couple questions:

  1. Does anyone actually utilize this data?
  2. Is anyone still actually editing this data?
  3. Does this data have any impact on Google, Yahoo, or Live searches?

My guess is that it’s simply not worth it anymore to work on or with dmoz. Your opinion?

RSS feed | Trackback URI

10 Comments »

Comment by no imageseanrox (SezWho)
2007-02-14 12:42:32

Sometimes it can take 6 months to a year and even more for a submission to get approved or not.

The forum for DMOZ is still pretty active, so that’s always a good place to ask questions.

In regards to your other questions:

1, Google at one point was using DMOZ information… I’m not sure if they still mix it in anymore.

2, I’ve been an editor for DMOZ for a few years now but only in certain categories.

3, is sort of answered by number 1, however doing more checking Google isn’t really pulling much from DMOZ anymore… Yahoo and Microsoft/Live search are trying to do their own thing like other search sites.

Until your post, I hadn’t looked at DMOZ in quite some time… and don’t feel bad about not getting some of your sites listed… I’m an editor and have a few of my own sites waiting for approval now… going on close to 1.5 years… so too bad I am not an editor of other categories so I could approve more stuff.

Rate this:
2.9
Comment by no imageDouglas Karr (SezWho)
2007-02-14 19:30:07

Wow… 1.5 years! Do sites even last that long? That’s like 100 years in Internet Time. I guess I’ll forgo worrying about it and look to some other ways to get ‘findable’.
Rate this:
2.9
 
 
Comment by no imageAjay (SezWho)
2007-02-14 12:53:39

I believe it was dead sometime back.

I noticed that Alexa has started using DMOZ for petching the title and description.

Google too uses DMOZ for the same and gives that higher preference than the normal description.

DMOZ however, does need to speed up a lot.

Rate this:
2.9
 
Comment by no imageSteven Hodson (SezWho)
2007-02-14 12:57:19

about the only time I ever made use of dmoz was when Google would list it.

It could be a good alternative but I just don’t see it happening

Rate this:
2.9
 
2007-02-14 20:51:54

[...] is funny how separate posts can spark another thought process. Earlier I read a post by Doug Karr who was asking if dmoz was dead. then shortly after that was a post over at slashdot talking about [...]
 
Comment by no imageCVOS (SezWho)
2007-02-15 02:37:56

DMOZ has always been slow at adding new listings, and always will be. It is managed by unpaid volunteers, who can’t be expected to constantly monitor their categories for new links.

DMOZ activity has drastically decreased. It is still great to have a listing in this directory, but its just too unpredictable. Instead of pulling your hair out over this free resource (which could go down again without warning) just clench your teeth and pay Yahoo! 299 for their directory listing. Traffic & rank boost are better than DMOZ.

Rate this:
2.9
Comment by no imageDouglas Karr (SezWho)
2007-02-15 11:56:50

CVOS, do you have a link to the Yahoo! Directory listing? Thanks!
Rate this:
2.9
 
 
Comment by no imageAgustin (SezWho)
2007-02-15 15:47:28

DMOZ was a great idea in 1996! Now new sites are appearing so fast, that DMOZ can’t keep up. Additionally site submission and editor access were down and inaccessible for about 6 months!

Its a great snapshot of what were important and relevant sites years ago, but it has become a dinosaur in terms of usability. I doubt google, Yahoo or MSN, are stupid enough to still consider a listing in the dmoz as a highly important attribute to the quality of a site.

Its time to move on to more advanced projects on the web.

Rate this:
1.6
 
Comment by no imageCVOS (SezWho)
 
Comment by no imageAdrian (SezWho)
2008-03-08 20:04:50

dmoz is dead. useless, worthless and an utter waste of time. I spoke with one of the editors back in the day who confirmed this
Rate this:
1.6
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

My Comment Policy: I moderate comments. Please be patient:

  • Spam will happily be destroyed.
  • Use your real name, not some keywords. Otherwise it will be destroyed.
  • Mean comments aren't necessary. If I don't post them I will reply personally to let you know why.
  • Lewd comments will be edited, I don't want my readers leaving because of offensive content.
Great debate, criticism and colorful commentary is always appreciated and approved!